All briefs9 memos; each starts on a new page when printed and runs to two pages at most (the build checks it), then an appendix of notes and method.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 01 / 09
Qualifying offer: Brandon Lowe
For
GM, assistant GMs
Decide by
≈ Nov 1–5
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
Do we extend Brandon Lowe the qualifying offer, and what does his answer do to second and third base?
Recommendation
ConfidenceMedium
Extend the $23.15M qualifying offer by ≈ Nov 5. Expect him to decline: his market estimate ($30.8M a year for 3 years) beats the offer by $7.6M a year, and 12 of 14 comparable deals cleared it (86%); at the low end of his range ($21.8M a year) he could accept. If he declines, take the pick (about $8.6M net of his bonus); second base then goes to Nick Gonzales. Don't re-sign him above $13.5M a year under today's rules; his market estimate is $30.8M.
A clear lean: his chance of accepting is about 14% (80% range 6%–30%; 2 of last winter's 14 comparable deals came in below the offer), far enough below the 58% break-even that extending clears the $1.8M toss-up line even at the top of that range (+$4.1M). On the owners' proposed terms it pays either way with the floor money free and holds at face value. The risk is the accept branch: that year is worth −$6.4M under today's rules.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
His answer: the offer is one year at $23.15M; the Free-Agent Board prices him at 3 years × $30.8M (80% range $21.8M–$47.6M a year). Per year his estimate beats the offer by $7.6M and comes with 3 guaranteed years, so expect him to decline; at the low end of his range ($21.8M a year) the offer pays more for one year, so he could accept. His answer is due ≈ Nov 11–15.
Every branch, on one engine (2027 wins with the 80% range; playoff odds; payroll on the luxury-tax basis): Lowe leaves and third base stays in-house, Jared Triolo at third: 79.1 wins (80% range 67–91), 34% playoff odds, $126.0M; the plan, Lowe leaves, Isaac Paredes at third and Nick Gonzales at second: 81.7 wins (80% range 70–94), 44% playoff odds, $138.6M; Lowe accepts and the plan still adds Isaac Paredes, Gonzales to a utility role (535 PA): 83.5 wins (80% range 71–96), 51% playoff odds, $160.9M; Lowe re-signed at his market price: the same 83.5 wins for $168.5M in 2027, and the comp pick given up.
The gloves if he leaves (Fielding Lab, regressed, runs a season): at second Brandon Lowe +2.1 → Nick Gonzales −0.4 (−2.5); at third Nick Gonzales −7.7 → Isaac Paredes −1.4 (+6.3) on the plan. Second base gives back 2.5 runs like for like, a toss-up; net +3.8 runs a season with Isaac Paredes at third, also a toss-up.
Gonzales's role turns on Lowe. If Lowe stays, the best alignment moves Gonzales to a utility role (83.5 wins; 535 PA, 309 at short); Lowe at first keeps Gonzales the regular second baseman instead (82.9, −0.6; Lowe's first-base rating rests on 483 batters there in 2024–26, against 11,243 at second), or trade Gonzales (82.7; his 3 arbitration years are worth about $17.9M in prospects).
If he accepts: +1.8 wins and +7 points of playoff odds for $22.4M more 2027 payroll. At $9.0M a win that year is worth −$6.4M under today's rules. On the owners' proposed terms the accept branch's payroll ($159.3M) is still below their $171.2M floor, so its worth turns on what else the floor money buys: +$14.1M if the floor money has no other use and −$8.1M if it displaces an equally good one. His answer comes before the Rule 5 filing (Nov 17), when the plan's 40-man is already full (Henry Davis released before it): if he accepts, also acquire Isaac Paredes before it.
Extending pays unless he is at least 58% likely to accept: the pick, $8.6M net of his bonus, against −$6.4M if he accepts under today's rules. Last winter 2 of 14 comparable deals came in below the offer (12 of 14 cleared it, 86%), so his chance of accepting is about 14% (80% range 6%–30%): extending is worth +$6.5M at that point and +$4.1M at the top of the range, against a $1.8M toss-up line, so the call holds. On the owners' proposed terms, with the floor money free extending pays either way; at face value the break-even is 52% and extending is worth +$7.6M to +$3.6M across that range, the call holds.
Re-sign ceiling, with the pick he would cost ($8.6M net of his bonus) taken off: $13.5M a year for 3 years under today's rules. Under the owners' proposed floor, $11.5M a year if the floor money has other good uses, up to $46.6M if it has none. His market estimate is $30.8M ($27.1M on the owners' terms).
Park fit, not in the wins or the ceiling: PNC adds +2.3 runs per 600 PA to his batted-ball profile, about +0.23 wins a season, ≈$6.0M over a 3-year re-sign; counted, the ceiling would be about $15.5M a year, still below his $30.8M market estimate.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Extend the qualifying offerRecommended
If he declines: a pick worth about $8.6M net of his bonus. If he accepts: +1.8 wins for one year (83.5, 51%)
If he accepts: −$6.4M of value under today's rules, Gonzales moves to a utility role (535 PA, 309 at short); then also acquire Isaac Paredes before the Rule 5 filing (Nov 17)
Let him go with no offer
No accept branch (−$6.4M under today's rules)
No compensation pick; on the owners' proposed terms the accept branch would have been worth +$14.1M if the floor money has no other use and −$8.1M if it displaces an equally good one
Re-sign him at his market price (3 × $30.8M)
+1.8 wins in 2027 (83.5)
$17.3M a year above the walk-away under today's rules, and the pick is given up; if he signs before the Rule 5 filing (Nov 17), also acquire Isaac Paredes first
If he accepts: Lowe to first, Gonzales stays the regular second baseman
Gonzales plays second every day (82.9 wins), not a utility role
0.6 wins below Gonzales in a utility role (535 PA); Lowe has little record at first
If he accepts: trade Gonzales
About $17.9M in prospects for his arbitration years
82.7 wins, 0.8 below keeping him in a utility role (535 PA)
Risks
A multi-year deal covers his age-32 to 34 seasons; his projection falls to 0.9 WAR by 2029.
His 2026 glove was an outlier against his record; the plan's 83.5 wins already use the regressed rating.
The next CBA could change qualifying-offer compensation; the pick's value rests on today's rules.
What would change our mind
If the market for him looks like less than $23.15M a year, expect him to accept: then choose between Gonzales in a utility role (535 PA), Lowe at first, or trading Gonzales; on the plan's alignment, also acquire Isaac Paredes before the Rule 5 filing (Nov 17). If the new CBA removes qualifying-offer compensation, the offer's upside is gone.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 02 / 09
Rule 5 protection
For
GM, farm director
Decide by
Nov 17
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
Which of the 54 Rule 5-eligible players get 40-man spots by Nov 17?
Recommendation
ConfidenceMedium
Protect Termarr Johnson (2B, AAA, FV 45), Derek Diamond (SIRP, AAA, FV 40) and Keiner Delgado (SS, AA, FV 40) by Nov 17. Expose the rest; the most likely to be taken is Cy Nielson (AAA, risk 0.23; expected loss 0.03 long-term WAR, below the 0.06 that cutting Noah Murdock for a fourth spot would cost; the plan's rule protects at most three).
A clear lean: each protected player's expected loss if exposed is larger than the spot he takes. The pick risks are ordered, not calibrated, and a lockout could cancel the draft's major-league phase.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
Who is eligible: 54 total eligible, organization players off the 40-man (CBA rule: draft or signing date and age), 33 of them at Double-A or Triple-A; 14 first-year eligible and 5 whose first year our data can't place. 15 more are likely minor-league free agents and leave before the draft unless re-signed; 2 have signing dates our data can't place (Jhonny Severino, Jeter Martinez).
Termarr Johnson (2B, AAA, FV 45): pick risk 0.53, so exposing him loses 0.85 long-term WAR; protecting him fills an open spot today, so it costs no one; with the floor list's 2 cuts it costs Lake Bachar (break-even risk 0.07). On the minor-league full-season IL since Aug 18; he stays in Triple-A until his medicals clear. Added to the 40-man Nov 17, he would be kept out of club facilities and club-supervised rehab during a lockout, as 40-man players were in 2021–22 (CBA knowledge, not in our data): set his rehab plan before Dec 2.
Derek Diamond (SIRP, AAA, FV 40): pick risk 0.46, so exposing him loses 0.18 long-term WAR; protecting him fills an open spot today, so it costs no one; with the floor list's 2 cuts it costs Lake Bachar (break-even risk 0.27); the call flips only past 3 cuts.
Keiner Delgado (SS, AA, FV 40): pick risk 0.25, so exposing him loses 0.15 long-term WAR; protecting him fills an open spot today, so it costs no one; with the floor list's 2 cuts it costs Lake Bachar (break-even risk 0.19); the call flips only past 2 cuts. At AA: below Triple-A.
Most likely taken among the exposed: Cy Nielson (SIRP, AAA, risk 0.23). Next: Brandon Neeck (AAA, 0.21), Justin Meis (AAA, 0.21), Landon Tomkins (AAA, 0.21). Risk is ordered, not calibrated.
Worth a 40-man spot for 2027 itself: Mitch Jebb (+0.11 wins if added, a toss-up; on the IL Apr 28–Jul 24); Jean Cabrera (+0.07 wins if added, a toss-up).
40-man count at each deadline, in transaction order: Oct 21, 39 (the roster snapshot); ≈ Nov 5, 38 (60-day IL players count again; pending free agents come off); before Nov 17, 37 (Release Henry Davis early, so the protections fit); Nov 17, 40 (Rule 5 protection filed); by Dec 1, 39 (Acquire Isaac Paredes for Jacob Gonzalez + Jhostynxon Garcia). Cut order if space is needed: Noah Murdock, Lake Bachar and Tyler Callihan.
If a lockout starts Dec 2 and cancels the Rule 5 draft's major-league phase, as the 2021–22 lockout did, a protection filed Nov 17 buys nothing this winter, and 40-man players were kept out of club facilities during that lockout (CBA knowledge; our data can't confirm either). The filing comes before anyone knows.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Protect Termarr Johnson, Derek Diamond and Keiner DelgadoRecommended
Keeps the players a club would most likely take
Uses 3 spots on the 40-man, which reaches 40 at the filing
Also protect Mitch Jebb
+0.11 wins in 2027
Needs a cut (Noah Murdock); a toss-up
Protect by grade alone
A simple rule
Protects Jean Cabrera (AA, risk 0.09) and Axiel Plaz (A+, risk 0.04) instead of Derek Diamond (risk 0.46) and Keiner Delgado (risk 0.25)
Risks
Cy Nielson is the most likely exposed player to go.
A lockout from Dec 2 could cancel the major-league phase of the draft (as in 2021–22); the filing comes before anyone knows (CBA knowledge, not in our data).
What would change our mind
If the Rule 5 draft is cancelled under a lockout, the protections matter less. The plan's 40-man is at 40 at the filing (Nov 17), with Henry Davis released before it rather than on the non-tender date (Nov 20): if Lowe accepts the qualifying offer or a free agent signs before then, Noah Murdock has to be cut before the filing too.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 03 / 09
Tender or non-tender, and the third catcher
For
GM, assistant GMs
Decide by
Nov 17
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
Which arbitration-eligible players do we tender, and who is the third catcher?
Recommendation
ConfidenceLow
Tender everyone except Henry Davis: shop him first, and if nothing comes, release him by Nov 17: the plan's three Rule 5 protections, filed Nov 17, need his spot, and the non-tender deadline (Nov 20) falls after the filing. First line up the third catcher: re-sign Christian Bethancourt to a minor-league deal, before ≈ Nov 5. On the owners' proposed terms the call flips only if the floor money has no other use (tender Henry Davis, decide in spring: +$2.6M); at face value re-signing Christian Bethancourt still holds (+$372K, against −$400K for tendering and deciding in spring).
A judgment call: 5 options sit within 0.2 wins' worth ($1.8M) of the best under today's rules; the pick is the best of them on value and needs no 40-man spot. Every other arbitration player's value covers his salary.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
10 arbitration-eligible players; projected 2027 salaries total $33.3M (Keystone's arbitration model). The closest calls:
Henry Davis: $1.5M salary against $139K of value as third catcher on today's roster, plus $618K of upside in later arbitration years: net −$756K.
Yohan Ramírez: $2.4M salary against $4.1M of value in the bullpen on the plan's roster, plus $1.6M of upside in later arbitration years: net +$3.3M.
Jared Triolo: $1.9M salary against $6.0M of value off the bench on the plan's roster ($5.7M as a starter on today's), plus $700K of upside in later arbitration years: net +$4.8M.
The third catcher: with Henry Davis gone, the 40-man has Endy Rodríguez and Rafael Flores Jr.; Endy Rodríguez ended 2026 on the 60-day IL (Left hip inflammation). The plan assumes he is ready for spring; that is a medical call we can't see. 11 of 46 hitters who ended a season on the 60-day IL opened the next on it.
If Endy Rodríguez isn't ready, on the plan's engine: with Derek Berg and Christian Bethancourt catching the rest, the healthy roster projects 82.0 (the plan's 81.7 counts those 137 PA at replacement level); he opens on the IL 81.9 (−0.09), out for the season 81.6 (−0.42). From the plan's 81.7, with the Triple-A catchers at replacement level: 81.4 (−0.32) and 80.8 (−0.92).
Third-catcher options, net value under today's rules (on the owners' proposed terms: with the floor money free / at face value): nobody added (Derek Berg next) −$61K ($0 / −$78K); tender Davis −$756K (+$2.6M / −$666K); tender, decide in spring −$427K (+$2.6M / −$400K); Christian Bethancourt (minor-league deal) +$450K (+$449K / +$372K); Jose Herrera (minor-league deal) −$61K ($0 / −$78K); Gary Sánchez (free agent) −$1.7M (+$822K / −$1.5M).
Christian Bethancourt was outrighted Sep 7, 2026 and has major-league time since 2013, so he can likely elect free agency after the season (an estimate). No 40-man spot or major-league salary unless he is added. If he signs elsewhere, the next options are to re-sign Jose Herrera to a minor-league deal (−$0.1M net) or tender Henry Davis and decide in spring (−$0.4M net); Rafael Flores Jr. and Derek Berg alone are 2 catchers not on an injured list, short of the three the plan needs.
The plan files three Rule 5 protections on Nov 17, and the 40-man reaches 40 then only with Henry Davis gone, so he has to go before the Rule 5 filing, by trade or release; the non-tender deadline (Nov 20) falls after it. If Lowe accepts the qualifying offer or a free agent signs before the filing, Noah Murdock has to be cut too.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Release Henry Davis; re-sign Christian Bethancourt to a minor-league dealRecommended
No 40-man spot; a catcher with major-league time behind Endy Rodríguez
He can sign elsewhere first; then the plan's rule (the best value within the toss-up line, then the fewest 40-man spots) takes re-signing Jose Herrera instead (−$61K under today's rules, no 40-man spot)
Tender Henry Davis and keep him as the third catcher
Keeps a known third catcher (on the owners' proposed terms +$2.6M with the floor money free, −$666K at face value)
$1.5M and a 40-man spot (−$756K under today's rules); keeping him means cutting Noah Murdock before the Rule 5 filing, since the protections need his spot
Tender Davis and decide in spring
Waits for Endy Rodríguez's medicals
Termination pay if released late in camp; −$427K under today's rules; keeping him means cutting Noah Murdock before the Rule 5 filing, since the protections need his spot
Risks
Endy Rodríguez has four injured-list stints since 2025; with two 40-man catchers, a second injury means a call-up.
The arbitration model can miss on relievers, whose awards follow saves and holds.
What would change our mind
If Christian Bethancourt signs elsewhere first, the plan's rule (the best value within the toss-up line, then the fewest 40-man spots) takes re-signing Jose Herrera instead (−$61K under today's rules, no 40-man spot). If Endy Rodríguez isn't cleared by Nov 17, reprice the catcher options with him out: they weigh a 24% chance that he opens the season on the IL.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 04 / 09
Spend to the floor
For
GM, ownership
Decide by
Dec 1
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
How much of the $34.0M gap to the owners' proposed floor do we spend before the CBA expires, and on whom?
Recommendation
ConfidenceMedium
Don't sign the list before Dec 1 at today's prices. Under today's rules none of it clears the market price of a win (0.81 wins per $10M against 1.11), and the three would cost $38.2M a year, $4.1M over the gap. No other use the plan measures clears it either: the best use not already in the plan, Jack Flaherty, mid-tier starter, buys 0.98 wins per $10M. If the new CBA sets the owners' floor, spend the $34.0M gap on short deals then: on their terms Jake Bauers, Jack Flaherty and Alex Vesia cost $33.6M a year and the whole list adds +3.1 wins, taking the plan from 81.7 to 84.8 wins and 56% playoff odds.
A clear lean on price: at today's prices the same money buys 1.1 more wins at the market rate than the list does, beyond the 0.2-win line. Waiting risks little: the Board's next lists add about the same. The floor itself is a proposal, and the owners'-terms prices are Keystone's assumption.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
The gap: the plan's 2027 payroll is $137.2M on the owners' terms (luxury-tax basis, benefits included) against their proposed $171.2M floor, $34.0M short. Under today's rules there is no floor; the same payroll is $138.6M.
The Free-Agent Board's list to the floor, at the owners'-terms prices (deals of 2 years or less while the CBA is unsettled): Jake Bauers (DH starter; 2 yr × $15.6M, +1.8 wins); Jack Flaherty (rotation depth: all starts; 2 yr × $9.5M, +1.0 wins); Alex Vesia (bullpen; 1 yr × $8.5M, +0.4 wins). Together +3.1 wins for $33.6M a year ($58.7M committed); plan plus list: 84.8 wins (80% range 73–97), 56% playoff odds.
Signed before the CBA expires (Dec 1), a deal is signed at today's prices: the same three cost $38.2M a year (Jake Bauers $17.7M, Jack Flaherty $10.8M, Alex Vesia $9.7M), $4.1M over the gap. The owners'-terms prices assume prices fall 12% under their proposal (Keystone's assumption, not data).
Under today's rules there is no floor, so a signing has to beat the market price of a win ($9.0M, 1.11 wins per $10M of 2027 payroll). At today's prices the list buys 0.81; each signing alone, on the plan: Jake Bauers 0.99, Jack Flaherty 0.91, Alex Vesia 0.63. No signing on the list clears it alone.
The plan's 40-man is at 40 when the Rule 5 protections are filed (Nov 17), with Henry Davis released before it: each signing needs a cut (Noah Murdock and Lake Bachar, in that order), made before the Rule 5 filing if he signs before it.
Beyond the list, the plan measures other uses of the money (2027 wins per $10M of payroll on this roster, one-off talent costs included, so the re-sign counts the pick he would cost): Jack Flaherty, mid-tier starter 0.98; Isaac Paredes by trade 0.90; Jazz Chisholm Jr., third base instead of the trade 0.68; Lowe on the qualifying offer 0.57; Lowe re-signed 0.46; the Board's floor list 0.92 at the owners'-terms prices, 0.81 at today's. At the plan's projection a win is worth about 4.0 points of playoff odds (the steep part of the curve), the same for every use, so the odds rank them as wins per $10M does: the list takes the plan from 44% to 56% playoff odds. Isaac Paredes by trade misses the market rate too; the third-base memo weighs it on what else gets the wins: the next option at third adds 1.0 fewer, while the Board's next lists add about what this one does, so the list can wait.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Wait for the CBARecommended
Prices and rules known; no deal that misses the market rate
A lockout from Dec 2 freezes signings, and the players can sign elsewhere first; the Board's next lists add about the same (+3.1 wins, +3.0 wins)
Sign the floor list now, at today's prices
+3.1 wins; nothing past 2028
$38.2M a year ($4.1M over the gap); 0.81 wins per $10M against the market's 1.11; two 40-man cuts, made before the Rule 5 filing
Under today's rules: back to 2026 payroll
+0.6 wins for $6.3M
2.5 fewer wins than the floor list
Risks
The floor is the owners' proposal, not a rule; nothing has been agreed.
A lockout from Dec 2 could run into spring (the 2021–22 lockout ended in March; CBA knowledge, not in our data).
What would change our mind
If the new CBA sets the floor, finish the list (or the Board's next one) before spring; if it drops the floor, spend only where a win costs less than the market. If a listed player's price falls below $9.0M a win before Dec 1, sign him.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 05 / 09
Fix third base
For
GM, pro scouting
Decide by
Dec 1
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
How do we fix third base, and what does the fix do to second base and to 2028?
Recommendation
ConfidenceMedium
Acquire Isaac Paredes (HOU) for Jacob Gonzalez and Jhostynxon Garcia once Houston exercises his $13.35M option (≈ Nov 1–5), and close before Dec 1: +2.6 wins, taking the plan to 81.7 (80% range 70–94) and 44% playoff odds, for $12.6M of 2027 payroll and $16.4M of prospect value. His value is the bat; his glove rates below Jared Triolo's. On price alone the trade is short of the market price of a win (0.90 wins per $10M against 1.11); the case is that nothing else gets its wins: the next option without a draft-pick cost adds 1.0 fewer. He is under control only through 2027: third base reopens for 2028.
A clear lean: he adds 1.0 wins more than the next realistic option without a draft-pick cost. The risks: his surplus is −$1.9M under today's rules (+$8.1M with the floor money free, −$5.2M at face value on the owners' proposed terms), and his glove at third reads differently by the two fielding measures.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
The fix: Isaac Paredes adds +2.6 wins over the in-house plan, Jared Triolo at third (79.1 wins, 80% range 67–91, 34% playoff odds): 81.7 wins (80% range 70–94), 44% playoff odds with him. The gloves (Fielding Lab, regressed, runs a season): Jared Triolo +3.6 at third against his −1.4, −5.0 runs (≈−0.5 wins), so his value is the bat.
Nick Gonzales is off third in every branch of the plan; he loses second only if Lowe stays and Isaac Paredes arrives (Lowe at second; Gonzales to a utility role or traded), and keeps it if Lowe plays first (the qualifying-offer brief has those branches). If Lowe accepts the qualifying offer, Isaac Paredes still adds +2.6 wins (against Lowe at third, a position with no record: the plan's flag).
His option: his 2027 is a $13.35M club option Houston decides ≈ Nov 1–5. If Houston declines it he isn't a free agent: at about 5 years, 160 days of service (5.160) he stays under Houston's control through arbitration, and reaches free agency only if non-tendered (Nov 20). Keystone's reading of the current CBA; our data can't confirm it. RosterResource notes the option “converts to mutual option with top 10 MVP finish”; the 2026 MVP vote isn't in our data, so confirm it is still Houston's call.
Health, two seasons: Injured-list stints since March 2025: Jul 20, 2025–Sep 19, 2025 (60-day IL, right hamstring strain). In 2026: 659 MLB plate appearances, no injured-list stint. The route rule bars only an unhealthy 2026, so the earlier 60-day stint is a medical flag for his physical, not a bar.
The sequence: club options and qualifying offers ≈ Nov 1–5; Lowe answers ≈ Nov 11–15; Rule 5 protection is filed Nov 17; the CBA expires Dec 1 and a lockout would freeze trades from ≈ Dec 2. He adds +2.6 wins if Lowe leaves and +2.6 if he stays, so the trade needn't wait for Lowe's answer; it must close before the CBA expires.
The package: Jacob Gonzalez and Jhostynxon Garcia ($16.4M against $16.0M needed; frees one 40-man spot after he takes his), chosen for its trade fit over the package rule's default (DeCaro + Barco): $0.36M more than that package and $0.41M (2.6%) over Houston's ask, inside the 10% cap, and better for both clubs: Houston's shortstop and center field needs run 0.59 and 0.64 in their first seasons (other clubs 0.28 and 0.17), Pittsburgh's 0.07 and 0.34.
His glove at third, two ways: the engine's fielding rating is −1.4 runs a season, but Keystone's zone model had him at −20.7 outs above expected in 2026 (≈−15.9 runs, −6.4 per 100 balls; +4.1 in 2024, −4.2 in 2025), where Pittsburgh's third basemen were −27.5 outs above expected (≈−21.1 runs; −6.4 per 100 balls, 30th of 30). The zone figure isn't in the wins.
Park and handedness: PNC takes about 3.6 runs per 600 PA from his batted-ball profile against a neutral park (−0.35 wins over his 562 PA), which the wins above leave out; with every hitter's park fit counted on both rosters (the Park page's plan branches), the edge over the in-house plan moves from +2.60 to +2.26 wins, and the call holds. He bats R; Lowe bats L, so the plan's lineup runs 5 right, 3 left and 1 switch.
Who loses a spot: Jared Triolo moves to the bench (415 PA on the plan, 309 at short and 106 at third); Termarr Johnson stays in Triple-A until his medicals clear (on the minor-league full-season IL since Aug 18). Cleared, he would take the bench spot from Ronny Simon and change the plan by +0.04 wins (that roster: 81.7, 80% range 70–94): a toss-up, so his health and development decide.
Put to the floor memo's test, the trade is short of the market price of a win (0.90 wins per $10M against 1.11, 0.62 wins below what $29.0M buys at that rate). Over its one year of control its surplus is −$1.9M under today's rules. What separates the trade is that nothing else gets its wins, while the Free-Agent Board's next lists add about what its floor list does.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Acquire Isaac ParedesRecommended
+2.6 wins, from the bat (his glove rates 5.0 runs a season below Jared Triolo's)
$16.4M of prospects; one year of control; surplus −$1.9M under today's rules
In-house: Jared Triolo at third
No acquisition cost (79.1 wins); the better glove (+3.6 runs a season)
2.6 fewer wins; 10 points lower playoff odds
Sign Jazz Chisholm Jr. instead (4 yr × $32.6M)
+2.5 wins; no prospects; covers 2028
About $5.8M of draft value net of the bonus (his qualifying offer); surplus −$33.0M under today's rules
Cheaper free agent: Edmundo Sosa (2 yr × $8.5M)
+0.8 wins; no prospects or pick
1.8 fewer wins than the trade
Risks
Houston may decline the option; he then stays Houston's through arbitration (Keystone's reading of the CBA), so the trade still runs through Houston.
His glove: the wins use the Fielding Lab's −1.4; if the zone model's −20.7 outs in 2026 is closer to his level, he costs more at third than the wins assume.
Prospect values are FanGraphs' preseason grades; an updated scouting read on the prospects sent moves the price.
A trade not closed by Dec 1 waits out a lockout.
What would change our mind
If Houston declines his option and won't trade him before Dec 1, sign the best free-agent fallback (Jazz Chisholm Jr., or Edmundo Sosa for less); if Lowe accepts the qualifying offer, keep the trade and settle Gonzales's role.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 06 / 09
Mitch Keller: keep, trade, or add a starter
For
GM, pitching coordinator
Decide by
Dec 1
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
Do we trade Mitch Keller's contract, keep him, or keep him and add a starter?
Recommendation
ConfidenceLow
Keep him for now, medicals first; revisit once he is cleared (he ended 2026 on the 60-day IL). Under today's rules the trade saves $13.3M in 2027 dollars against 1.2 wins over 2027–2028 worth $10.9M: net $2.4M for trading, but a club gains from the terms only if his medicals are clean. With the floor money spent either way (the Free-Agent Board's list measured on each branch, on the owners' proposed terms), keeping him comes to 84.8 wins and trading him 85.0, a toss-up. Adding a mid-tier starter, Jack Flaherty, adds +1.0 to +1.1 wins: his price doesn't beat the market price of a win, so it waits with the floor money.
No clear lean between keeping and trading him: under today's rules the money leans to trading once his medicals clear, and with the floor money spent the two come out within 0.2 wins. The real risk is health: if he and Jones both miss the season the plan loses 2.9 wins.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
The contract: $18.4M in 2027 and $20.4M in 2028 ($15.4M a year on the luxury-tax basis), against $21.8M of projected value (1.4 and 1.1 WAR): the salary runs $15.5M above his value in present value.
Health: Ended 2026 on the 60-day IL (Right arm teres major muscle injury). The plan assumes he is ready for spring; that is a medical call we can't see.
Every branch on the plan's roster: keep him, 81.7 wins (80% range 70–94), 44% playoff odds; trade him, 81.0 (−0.7); he opens on the injured list, 81.4 (−0.3); he and Jared Jones both miss the season, 78.7 (−2.9).
The trade: Pittsburgh keeps half of each remaining season: $7.7M a year of his $15.4M luxury-tax hit in 2027, 2028. No player or prospect comes back in the model. It saves $6.9M of 2027 payroll on the luxury-tax basis ($7.7M less the ≈$780K minimum salary of the arm who takes his spot); $13.3M over 2027–28 in present value under today's rules. On the owners' proposed terms the club has to spend up to the floor anyway, so the saving is worth $0 with the floor money free, $12.9M at face value.
Would a club take him on those terms? It gains $3.1M of surplus under today's rules if he is healthy, −$188K if he opens on the injured list ($502K and −$2.4M on the owners' proposed terms at face value; the acquiring club's payroll against the floor isn't modeled), so the trade works only once his medicals are clean.
Keep him and add a mid-tier starter: Jack Flaherty (2 yr × $10.8M) adds +1.0 wins with the plan's rotation rule (82.7, $148.6M payroll), +1.1 with Keller moved to the bullpen (82.8). The plan's 40-man is already full at the Rule 5 filing (Nov 17), so a signing before it needs one more spot: acquire Isaac Paredes first.
Results: ERA 5.29 in 2026 against a 4.54 FIP and 4.61 xFIP; ERAs of 4.25 and 4.19 in 2024–25. Keystone Stuff 93.
Velocity: his four-seamer averaged 94.5 → 94.1 → 93.3 mph (2024–2025–2026); leaving out the 4 starts in the month before his IL stint he sat 93.4, 0.5 mph short of 2025 after typical aging.
His hook (Bullpen Strategy, the pitching-usage brief): two times through, an 18-batter leash (about 66 pitches) that hands the pen about 29 innings and saves 3.3 ± 1.6 runs a season. The plan's 128 innings for him come before that hook (about 29 of them move to the pen with it); it doubles as the workload plan for his return from the IL.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Keep himRecommended
Sells nothing at his lowest value; the trade stays open once he is healthy
$18.4M of 2027 salary; $15.5M above his value over the contract
Trade him, keeping half his salary
Saves $6.9M of 2027 payroll (worth $0 with the floor money free, $12.9M at face value on the owners' proposed terms)
−0.7 wins; a club gains only if he is healthy (−$188K to it if not)
Keep him and sign Jack Flaherty
+1.0 to +1.1 wins; covers a Keller or Jones injury
$10.8M a year for 2 years; if he signs before the Rule 5 filing, also acquire Isaac Paredes first
Risks
The arm injury may cost velocity for good; spring readings are the first test.
If he opens on the injured list, 35 starter IP go to replacement level.
Most of the gap is contract, not pitching: even a full recovery leaves him paid above his projected value.
What would change our mind
If a club offers to take at least half of the remaining $38.8M for modest talent once his medicals clear, or his fastball in his first April starts sits below 93.4 mph (spring readings run low and don't count).
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 07 / 09
Extension: Paul Skenes
For
GM, ownership, medical staff
Decide by
Dec 1
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
Should we offer Paul Skenes an extension before the CBA expires, and on what terms?
Recommendation
ConfidenceLow
Stage it. By mid-November: medical and biomechanics review of the four-seam velocity drop and the arm-angle change (the club's medical data; Keystone has none). If the cause is benign, offer up to $22.6M a year for 5 years before Dec 1, when the CBA expires. If not, go year to year and reopen if his four-seamer averages 97.5 mph or more by May 2027.
A judgment call: the gap between the market price and our walk-away is smaller than the price model's typical miss, and a velocity haircut flips it.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
Velocity: his four-seamer averaged 98.8 → 98.2 → 96.8 mph (2024–2025–2026), −2.0 mph since 2024, while his four-seam arm angle went 24° → 24° → 27°. Keystone has no medical or biomechanics data, so the cause is the club's call.
Pitch Lab: Keystone Stuff 104 in 2026, −10 since 2025 (−11 on the held-out model), about 9.4 runs at stake; the Pitch Lab flags the drop.
The deal zone at 5 years: comparable deals price him at $22.3M a year against a walk-away of $22.6M, a gap of $219K inside the price model's typical miss of $3.7M, so there is no reliable negotiating room.
The walk-away is a range, $19.6M–$25.6M a year at 5 years; it moves most with attrition a year ($20.2M–$25.3M); arbitration salaries ($20.4M–$24.8M); $ per WAR ($21.2M–$25.6M).
With a 5% cut to his projection for the velocity, the best length is 4 years and the deal loses $1.7M.
Under the owners' proposed floor (longest deal 6 years): at face value 5 years gains $831K; if the floor money has no other use, 6 years gains $21.2M.
Innings basis: the plan gives him 144 IP and 4.0 WAR in 2027; his own projection is 4.8 WAR over a full season. Losing him would cost the plan 3.5 wins.
With options: 3 guaranteed years (2027–2029) plus club options for 2030–2031 at $22.3M (the plain 5-year deal's market AAV) raise our walk-away on the guaranteed years to $26.4M (plain 3 years: $14.9M against a $16.3M market price): the club pays the option years only if he is still healthy, worth $10.5M over guaranteeing them at the same price. What he would accept for this structure is unknown.
The medical review is worth $236K–$660K on money at P(benign) 25%–75% (Keystone has no estimate of it): extending only on a benign finding gains $944K at 5 years, while a 5% velocity haircut would make the same deal lose $2.6M.
Henry Davis caught 2,797 of Paul Skenes's 2,890 pitches in 2026 (97%); the plan's catchers caught 0 (Flores Jr.), 93 (Rodríguez), 0 (Berg), 0 (Bethancourt). The third-catcher call ends that pairing; it isn't counted in the wins.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
4 years at up to $20.0M
Market $19.8M: $545K of surplus
Buys fewer free-agent years
5 years at up to $22.6MRecommended
Market $22.3M: $944K of surplus
Long money on a pitcher whose velocity is down
6 years at up to $23.8M
Market $24.2M: −$1.8M of surplus
Long money on a pitcher whose velocity is down
Go year to year
Keeps the arbitration discount; no long-term injury exposure
He can leave after 2029
Risks
A lockout from Dec 2 freezes talks with 40-man players (CBA knowledge, as in 2021–22); a new CBA can change every input here.
A UCL injury would turn a long deal deeply negative.
The walk-away rests on Keystone's arbitration path and $9.0M a win; the price model extrapolates above its largest comparable.
Not modelled: a qualifying offer or a trade in his last control year (2029): either would add value to going year to year, so the status quo would rise and the walk-away fall; Keystone doesn't price them.
What would change our mind
If the medical review finds a benign cause, move fast at up to $22.6M for 5 years; if not, reopen when his four-seamer averages 97.5 mph or more.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 08 / 09
2027 starter hook and bullpen roles
For
Manager, pitching coach, GM
Decide by
Spring training
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
How long should each starter go, and who gets the biggest bullpen spots?
Recommendation
ConfidenceMedium
Rotation (Winter Plan): Paul Skenes, Jared Jones, Braxton Ashcraft, Bubba Chandler and Mitch Keller. Two times through for Mitch Keller once his medicals clear. Let Braxton Ashcraft face the order a third time (a toss-up). Let Paul Skenes face it too, pending the review of his velocity drop. Jared Jones: a 22-batter leash (about 81 pitches) after his arm injury, not an open third time; past it, decide by matchup (a toss-up). Give Bubba Chandler development innings on a 22-batter leash (about 82 pitches), once through the top of the order a third time, at about 1.0 ± 1.2 runs against a two-times-through hook (a toss-up); the goal is first two passes at .306 xwOBA or better, not a third-time skill, pending the review of his velocity drop. Ladder: Mason Montgomery and Yohan Ramírez in the late innings (within noise of each other); Evan Sisk and Luke Weaver setting up (within noise of each other). Move Evan Sisk into the leverage ladder. Move Isaac Mattson out of it.
The league step is stable every season and leverage is well measured. The per-pitcher calls rest on 2026 with 2024–25 at half weight, and a starter's own penalty barely repeats (r = 0.07). Mitch Keller's call holds only if he is healthy.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
Hitters gain +.012 xwOBA the second time they face a starter and +.006 more the third, adjusted for pitcher and hitter quality (2024–26).
The step is positive in each of 3 seasons; a starter's own third-time penalty barely repeats (r = 0.07), so the league step does the work.
Pittsburgh starters reached a third time through in 80% of starts (20th of 30).
Handing Mitch Keller's third-time batters to the 4th–8th relievers (.309 xwOBA after a second-look penalty) saves about 3.3 runs (≈0.3 wins) and adds about 29 relief innings, within a cap of 60. About 1.3 of those runs are the time-through-order step; the rest is the starter already pitching below those relievers.
Leverage alignment 0.46 (18th of 30). Isaac Mattson got 9 high-leverage entries despite ranking near the bottom on skill.
40% of 2026's high-leverage entries left with Gregory Soto (34) and three relievers who left the organization during the season (24); the ladder in the recommendation ranks the plan's 2027 pen on skill.
2028: Luke Weaver's contract ends after 2027 ($12.5M), so his setup role reopens; next in the ladder is Wilber Dotel; Bubba Chandler is under club control through 2031 (Keystone's arbitration path), so his development innings pay off past 2027.
Health in the rotation: Bubba Chandler: late-season velocity −1.3 mph and arm angle −3.2° against his baseline (last outing Sep 25); Mitch Keller: on the 60-day IL since Aug 3 (Right arm teres major muscle injury).
≈3 runs (≈0.3 wins); best arms in the biggest spots
≈29 more relief innings to cover
Pitch-count hooks (status quo)
Familiar to players and staff
Ignores where the penalty happens
Openers and bulk relievers for back-end starters
Avoids the third pass
Needs a deeper, rested pen
Risks
Mitch Keller: on the 60-day IL since Aug 3 (Right arm teres major muscle injury); his call assumes he is ready.
Bullpen capacity: the extra innings need a seventh or eighth reliever who can go multiple innings.
Starters may resist shorter outings; framing it as a role, not a demotion, matters.
What would change our mind
If spring and early-season data show a starter's third-time results holding up, or the bridge relievers' quality drops.
KeystoneDecision brief
No. 09 / 09
2027 ABS challenge policy
For
Manager, bench coach, catchers
Decide by
Spring training
Prepared
Oct 23, 2026
Data
Sep 27, 2026
The question
What challenge rules does the staff run in 2027?
Recommendation
ConfidenceLow
Keep challenging as the staff does now, with the break-even card as the written rule so the old grid isn't used: catchers own the defensive challenges; challenge a call when you're at least as sure as its count's break-even: 6%–32% with both challenges left before the 7th, 13%–53% with the last one before the 7th, 3%–17% from the 7th inning on. Early in the game, batters with the last challenge hold 0-0 and 0-1 through the 2nd and 1-1 through the 1st, unless the call is clear. No green lists. Against how clubs already challenge, the card is a toss-up (≈0 runs a season, 80% range −0.04 to +0.05, inside the plan's 1.9-run toss-up line). It would have held back none of Pittsburgh's 196 second-half challenges. Don't go back to the old count grid: in the forward test it cost about 9.4 runs per club a season, late-game exception included.
No clear lean on the card itself: against how clubs already challenge, its forward-tested 80% range (−0.04 to +0.05 runs a season) sits inside the plan's 1.9-run toss-up line, so adopting it is a judgment call. The clear part is the old grid: it lost 9.4 runs per club a season in the forward test, 8.9 even at the good end of its range. The test scores 5,227 second-half challenges on rules fit before Jul 1.
Staff response☐ Accept ☐ Modify ☐ Not now
Evidence
Pittsburgh won 47.0% of its 355 challenges (30th of 30; MLB 53.9%), −6.4 runs against an average club facing the same pitches. Accuracy in the spots it chose accounts for 5.9 of those runs, the accuracy gap. Regressed, 2026's club accuracy is worth about 8 overturns at 2026 volume; its catcher part moves if the catchers change.
A failed challenge costs about 0.03 runs under the rules as played (Savant's run values by game state), not the flat 0.21 the old count grid assumed. So the bar for a challenge depends on the game state as well as the count. The card's break-evens, from count to count: 6%–32% with both challenges left before the 7th, 13%–53% with the last one before the 7th, 3%–17% from the 7th inning on.
The forward test (rules fit on the 5,330 challenges before Jul 1, scored on the 5,227 after it, per club over a season): the card is worth ≈0 runs (−0.04 to +0.05, 80% range) against how clubs already challenged, inside the plan's toss-up line (1.9 runs, 0.2 wins). The old count grid (early counts held; no hold from the 7th inning on with no challenge lost yet and the score within 2 runs) cost 9.4 runs (8.9–9.9), about 1.0 wins. Pittsburgh's own second half: the card would have held back none of its 196 challenges, the old grid 110.
Catchers already make most defensive challenges: 175 of 192 in 2026, at 52% (league catchers 59%).
Is accuracy a skill? Odd vs. even challenges: batters r = −0.05 (−0.20 to 0.09, 182 hitters); catchers r = 0.08 (−0.02 to 0.19, 338 player-seasons). Neither is shown to repeat, so there are no green lists.
Not measured: challenging more might add runs (573 overturnable calls went unchallenged), but the data can't say how sure players were on calls they let go.
The plan's catchers: Endy Rodríguez, Rafael Flores Jr. and Christian Bethancourt.
Options considered
Option
Upside
Downside
Keep challenging as now, with the break-even card written downRecommended
≈0 runs a season against how clubs challenged (80% range −0.04 to +0.05), a toss-up; it keeps the old grid's 9.4-run cost off the table
Adds no runs by itself: the gain would come from accuracy or from challenging more, which isn't measured
The old count grid (early counts held; no hold from the 7th inning on with no challenge lost yet and the score within 2 runs)
A simple rule
−9.4 runs per club a season in the forward test (≈−1.0 wins)
Status quo, nothing written down
No change management
Nothing keeps the old grid out of use; 2026 finished 30th of 30 at winning challenges, mostly accuracy that regresses on its own
Risks
Players may resist a bar set by game state rather than feel.
The zone or the challenge rules could change for 2027.
The cost of a failure is Savant's run value by game state; a club's own game-state model could move the bars.
What would change our mind
If spring pilots show a challenger's success repeating (a real skill), give him a looser bar; if the challenge rules change, refit the card.
Appendix · Notes and method
No. 01 · Qualifying offer: Brandon Lowe
If he accepts, the plan plays him at second and Isaac Paredes at third; the reverse (Lowe at third and Paredes at second) costs 0.9 wins.
Without an acquisition, keeping Lowe puts him at third (80.8 wins) on a rating with no record there. The plan's flag: Brandon Lowe at third base: 0 batters there in 2024–26; the engine rates him from his second base record.
If he declines and signs elsewhere, Pittsburgh gets a compensation pick (the low end of his price range is $65M in total, above $50M) worth about $8.6M net of his signing bonus ($11.6M before it). Current CBA rules as Keystone reads them; not in our data, and the CBA that expires Dec 1, 2026 could change them.
The floor money has a better use on this roster: Jack Flaherty adds 0.98 wins per $10M of 2027 payroll; Lowe re-signed adds 0.46, counting the pick he would cost.
His glove: +12.4 fielding runs (+15 OAA) at second in 2026, a career high: +4 OAA in 2023, 0 OAA in 2024, −14 OAA in 2025. The Fielding Lab's regressed rating at second is +2.1 runs a season.
Against left-handed pitching in 2026: .266 xwOBA in 211 PA; swing decisions about −0.8 runs per 100 pitches (decision value −1.6 at 0.49 runs a unit); regressed, with the matchup added back, about −0.23 runs per 100 pitches (the Hitting Lab's estimate). His own projection is 2.5 WAR (age 32); on this roster he adds 1.8, because Gonzales loses his regular spot.
No. 03 · Tender or non-tender, and the third catcher
An arbitration salary isn't guaranteed until Opening Day: a player released in spring is owed 30 days' pay, or 45 days' late in camp (45 of the 186-day 2026 season, the figure used here). Keystone's reading of the CBA's termination-pay rule; our data can't confirm it, and the next CBA could change it.
Keystone's reading of the CBA: before the tender deadline a club clears a 40-man spot by trade, release or designation for assignment; if Davis cleared waivers, an outright to Triple-A could keep him as depth off the 40-man. Our data can't confirm these rules or a waiver outcome.
No. 04 · Spend to the floor
Under today's rules the money is a budget choice. The Board's lists at other budgets: Back to 2026 payroll: +0.6 wins for $6.3M (George Springer); $15M: +1.4 wins for $14.3M (Patrick Sandoval and George Springer); $30M: +2.7 wins for $28.5M (Jake Bauers and Jack Flaherty).
No. 05 · Fix third base
The free-agent route at second base instead (Gonzales stays at third, no trade, the prospects stay): Mauricio Dubón (2 yr × $14.4M) +0.4 wins over the in-house plan (79.5, −2.2 against the trade); Edmundo Sosa (2 yr × $8.5M) +0.1 wins over the in-house plan (79.2, −2.4 against the trade); Gleyber Torres (2 yr × $7.5M) +0.1 wins over the in-house plan (79.2, −2.5 against the trade).
The trade fit, from the depth model's numbers: Jacob Gonzalez (SS, FV 35+, arrives 2027): Houston’s shortstop need 0.59 over 2027–29 (covered 2027, thin 2028–29), the other clubs 0.28; Pittsburgh’s shortstop: no surplus (other clubs 0.02), need 0.07 (below the bar 2027–28, covered 2029; other clubs 0.28, only need above theirs counts), −0.02 net. Fit +0.18. Jhostynxon Garcia (CF, FV 45, arrives 2027): Houston’s center field need 0.64 over 2027–29 (thin 2027–29), the other clubs 0.17; Pittsburgh’s center field: surplus 0.17 (other clubs 0.04), need 0.34 (below the bar 2027, covered 2028, thin 2029; other clubs 0.17, only need above theirs counts), −0.04 net. Fit +0.27. Package fit +0.25, value-weighted: +0.44 from Houston’s needs and −0.04 from Pittsburgh’s depth, each net of the other clubs. Chosen for fit over the rule’s default package, Jason DeCaro + Hunter Barco ($16.05M, fit +0.06): $0.36M more, $0.41M (2.6%) over the $16.01M ask (the cap is 10%), for 0.19 more fit (the margin is 0.15). Each club’s side against the default: Houston’s +0.18 → +0.44 (+0.26), Pittsburgh’s −0.12 → −0.04 (+0.08); a switch needs neither side lower and one up 0.25 or more.
The price rule: his surplus value or half his 2027 value, whichever is larger, plus 10%; Pittsburgh's top 3 prospects stay off the table.
The trade's wins are +10 points of playoff odds (about 4.0 a win, the steep part of the curve), but every use of money gets that slope.
2028: he is a free agent after 2027, so third base reopens. Best in-house answer today: Duce Gourson (AAA, FV 45, 1.5 WAR per 600 PA at third on the plan's engine), then Jared Triolo (0.9), Murf Gray (0.8). Nick Gonzales's 2028 arbitration estimate is $5.3M.
Alternatives on the same roster: Ezequiel Duran (TEX, trade) +1.6 wins; Ernie Clement (TOR, trade) +0.8 wins; Jazz Chisholm Jr. (free agent, 4 yr × $32.6M) +2.5, and signing him costs about $5.8M of draft value net of the bonus (a qualifying-offer free agent); Edmundo Sosa (free agent, 2 yr × $8.5M) +0.8; Eugenio Suárez (free agent, 2 yr × $6.7M) +0.7; Alec Bohm (free agent, 2 yr × $5.5M) +0.6.
Best affordable acquisition a club would plausibly trade: he plays third in the plan, 2027 salary ≤ $15M, talent cost ≤ $30M, ≥ 0.5 wins over the in-house plan, a healthy 2026 (100+ MLB plate appearances, not on the 60-day IL; a 60-day stint in 2025 is shown as a medical flag, not a bar), and not a player with no-trade rights, a star, just signed or extended, a young core player, a contender’s regular, or someone Pittsburgh traded away in the last two years. The pick adds the most 2027 wins; within 0.3 wins, the longer control wins the tie.
No. 06 · Mitch Keller: keep, trade, or add a starter
Cover if he and Jones both miss the season. Starter innings: Keller 128 → 0 IP, Jones 116 → 0 IP. Picking them up: Mlodzinski 0 → 105 IP, Harrington 0 → 68 IP. 70 starter IP go to replacement level. Both still paid; on the 60-day IL they come off the 40-man count.
No. 07 · Extension: Paul Skenes
Every length (market price vs walk-away): 3 yr $16.3M vs $14.9M; 4 yr $19.8M vs $20.0M; 5 yr $22.3M vs $22.6M; 6 yr $24.2M vs $23.8M; 7 yr $25.6M vs $24.3M; 8 yr $26.7M vs $24.4M.
Arbitration path if he goes year to year (Keystone's model, wins-only): $7.0M, $14.0M, $26.0M; a higher path raises the walk-away.
No. 09 · 2027 ABS challenge policy
The old count grid is the rule Keystone recommended before this forward test priced a failed challenge by game state; the decision log on the Product page records the change.