Amed Rosario
- Free agent est. 1 yr × $1.0M ($541K–$2M)
- PNC Park Pittsburgh’s home park: −1.1 runs per 600 PA against an average park (−0.06 wins over 341 PA; his WAR leaves this out); home runs ×0.77 (×0.77 for right-handed hitters as a group). Park Fit →
Hitting · 2026
243 PA: percentiles need 300+, so values only
Platoon splits · swing path
By pitcher handedness
| vs | PA | wOBA | xwOBA | K% | BB% | Chase | Decisions | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHP | 160 | .275 | .303 | 21% | 6% | 40% | −1.26 | +0.66 |
| RHP | 83 | .364 | .319 | 29% | 5% | 41% | −1.38 | +1.54 |
- Attack angle
- 6.5° (51% in 5–20°)
- Attack direction
- −3.7°
- Swing length
- 7.4 ft
- Fast-swing rate
- 37%
- Pull-air %
- 14.5%
- Hard-hit %
- 39.3%
- Slash · wRC+
- .238/.279/.405 · 88
Zone map · 2026
Where he does damage, and where to pitch him
Does the most damage middle-in (+5.9 vs. league per 100; 2.5 standard errors on 42 pitches, inside the noise for the best of nine cells).
Weakest middle-away (−2.6), but only 1.1 standard errors from average on 45 pitches: no in-zone spot to attack yet.
Runs per 100 pitches vs. an average RHB: better · worse. Catcher’s view · 801 pitches · faded cells are within one standard error of average. A spot is called only when it is farther from average than the best or worst of nine average cells gets 95% of the time (set from the league’s own pitches: about 3 standard errors above, 2 below).
Most similar hitters
Swings like Rosario: bat path, contact quality and approach
| Similarity | Player | xwOBA | ’26 WAR | ’27 proj | 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | Jesús Sánchez AZ · ’97 | .320 | −0.4 | 0.4 | Free agent |
| 64 | Jackson Merrill SD · ’03 | .348 | 4.2 | 4.1 | Signed $7.1M |
| 63 | Elias Díaz TEX · ’90 | .275 | 0.5 | 0.0 | Free agent |
| 62 | Jarren Duran BOS · ’96 | .306 | 0.5 | 2.3 | Arb |
| 61 | Konnor Griffin PIT · ’06 | .316 | 1.4 | 1.7 | Signed $3.3M |
Nearest neighbours on bat speed, swing length, attack angle, squared-up and blast rates, EV90, barrels, pull-air, chase, zone contact, K% and BB%. 2026 regulars only.
Fielding
2027 rating at every position he can play · OAA by position · range by direction · tools. Same engine as the Fielding Lab and the Winter Plan.
| Season | Pos | OAA | Range | Arm, DP | Runs | Batters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LF | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 24 |
| 2026 | RF | −1 | −1 | 0.0 | −1.0 | 105 |
| 2026 | 2B | −1 | −1 | −0.1 | −1.1 | 189 |
| 2026 | 3B | −8 | −6 | −0.4 | −6.4 | 1,349 |
| 2025 | RF | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 67 |
| 2025 | 2B | −2 | −2 | 0.0 | −2.0 | 544 |
| 2025 | 3B | −5 | −3 | +0.1 | −2.9 | 1,032 |
| 2024 | 3B | −2 | −2 | 0.0 | −2.0 | 400 |
| 2024 | SS | −2 | −1 | 0.0 | −1.0 | 427 |
| 2024 | 2B | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 766 |
| 2024 | RF | −4 | −4 | 0.0 | −4.0 | 805 |
| 2023 | 2B | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 735 |
| 2023 | SS | −14 | −11 | 0.0 | −11.0 | 3,590 |
Runs = range plus his arm and double-play runs spread over his positions by outs (Fielding Run Value, from 2023): what the rating counts.
At 3B in 2026, the biggest loss came in (charging) (−4 outs): a coaching target.
Tools (percentile; arm among 3Bs)| Play | Made | Chances | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★★★★★ | 0 | 0 | — |
| ★★★★ | 0 | 0 | — |
| ★★★ | 0 | 1 | 0% |
| ★★ | 0 | 0 | — |
| ★ | 0 | 0 | — |
| Season | Zone | Balls | Outs vs. exp. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3B | 95 | −4.6 |
| 2025 | 3B | 75 | −5.2 |
| 2025 | 2B | 52 | −4.8 |
| 2024 | SS | 45 | +1.0 |
| 2024 | RF | 90 | −4.7 |
| 2024 | 2B | 50 | +2.0 |
The zone rating counts every ball hit to his part of the field while he played there, his club’s positioning included; Savant OAA uses his actual starting spot and is the better individual grade. They agree best in the outfield. See the model card.
Contract & projection
Club control (RosterResource) · Keystone projected WAR
A pending free agent: no club controls his 2027. Contract Studio →
ABS challenges · 2026
Baseball Savant