Noelvi Marte
- Cincinnati’s roster as it stands on the 40-man, off the 26-man (call-up depth)
Hitting · 2026
201 PA: percentiles need 300+, so values only
Platoon splits · swing path
By pitcher handedness
| vs | PA | wOBA | xwOBA | K% | BB% | Chase | Decisions | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHP | 53 | .231 | .206 | 36% | 4% | 42% | −2.17 | −1.85 |
| RHP | 148 | .256 | .263 | 22% | 5% | 41% | −1.92 | −0.44 |
- Attack angle
- 9.1° (54% in 5–20°)
- Attack direction
- −4.2°
- Swing length
- 7.4 ft
- Fast-swing rate
- 25%
- Pull-air %
- 13.0%
- Hard-hit %
- 30.9%
- Slash · wRC+
- .190/.229/.321 · 47
Zone map · 2026
Where he does damage, and where to pitch him
Does the most damage down over the middle (+3.8 vs. league per 100; 1.7 standard errors on 43 pitches, inside the noise for the best of nine cells).
Weakest middle-in (−2.9), but only 1.3 standard errors from average on 26 pitches: no in-zone spot to attack yet.
Runs per 100 pitches vs. an average RHB: better · worse. Catcher’s view · 678 pitches · faded cells are within one standard error of average. A spot is called only when it is farther from average than the best or worst of nine average cells gets 95% of the time (set from the league’s own pitches: about 3 standard errors above, 2 below).
Most similar hitters
Swings like Marte: bat path, contact quality and approach
| Similarity | Player | xwOBA | ’26 WAR | ’27 proj | 2027 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | Angel Martínez CLE · ’02 | .303 | 1.8 | 1.0 | Pre-arb |
| 57 | Jose Fernandez AZ · ’03 | .286 | 0.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 56 | Ezequiel Duran TEX · ’99 | .302 | 4.4 | 2.2 | Arb |
| 55 | Brandon Marsh PHI · ’97 | .302 | 0.3 | 1.3 | Arb |
| 54 | Oswald Peraza LAA · ’00 | .272 | 0.4 | 0.0 | Arb |
Nearest neighbours on bat speed, swing length, attack angle, squared-up and blast rates, EV90, barrels, pull-air, chase, zone contact, K% and BB%. 2026 regulars only.
Fielding
2027 rating at every position he can play · OAA by position · range by direction · tools. Same engine as the Fielding Lab and the Winter Plan.
| Season | Pos | OAA | Range | Arm, DP | Runs | Batters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | CF | −2 | −2 | −0.1 | −2.1 | 78 |
| 2026 | RF | −2 | −2 | −2.1 | −4.1 | 1,905 |
| 2025 | CF | −1 | −1 | 0.0 | −1.0 | 40 |
| 2025 | 3B | −2 | −2 | +0.3 | −1.7 | 1,202 |
| 2025 | RF | −2 | −2 | +0.5 | −1.5 | 1,844 |
| 2024 | 3B | −11 | −8 | −1.0 | −9.0 | 1,989 |
| 2023 | SS | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 106 |
| 2023 | 3B | −2 | −2 | −0.1 | −2.1 | 1,056 |
Runs = range plus his arm and double-play runs spread over his positions by outs (Fielding Run Value, from 2023): what the rating counts.
At RF in 2026, the biggest loss came toward 3B line (−2 outs): a coaching target.
Tools (percentile; arm among RFs)| Play | Made | Chances | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★★★★★ | 0 | 8 | 0% |
| ★★★★ | 0 | 2 | 0% |
| ★★★ | 1 | 5 | 20% |
| ★★ | 5 | 7 | 71% |
| ★ | 9 | 10 | 90% |
| Season | Zone | Balls | Outs vs. exp. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | RF | 175 | −2.4 |
| 2025 | RF | 182 | −3.4 |
| 2025 | 3B | 79 | −3.9 |
| 2024 | 3B | 141 | −0.9 |
The zone rating counts every ball hit to his part of the field while he played there, his club’s positioning included; Savant OAA uses his actual starting spot and is the better individual grade. They agree best in the outfield. See the model card.
Contract & projection
Club control (RosterResource) · Keystone projected WAR
Minor leagues
MLB Stats API · public box-score data
| SeasonLevel | Level | Team | Age | G | PA / IP | PA / IP ·Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026AAA | AAA | Louisville Bats | 24 | 66 | 279 PA | 279 PA · .332/.366/.498 · 9 HR · 16.5% K · 5.0% BB |
| 2025AA | AA | Chattanooga Lookouts | 23 | 4 | 17 PA | 17 PA · .267/.353/.400 · 0 HR · 5.9% K · 5.9% BB |
| 2025AAA | AAA | Louisville Bats | 23 | 12 | 53 PA | 53 PA · .326/.434/.535 · 1 HR · 13.2% K · 15.1% BB |
| 2025ROK | ROK | ACL Reds | 23 | 3 | 11 PA | 11 PA · .400/.455/.700 · 1 HR · 0.0% K · 9.1% BB |
ABS challenges · 2026
Baseball Savant